The Spirit, the Scriptures and the Creeds
The Apostles' Creed, line by line
The baptismal creed of the West, taken one clause at a time.
You are reading the brief version. Switch the depth control to Complete for the full treatment.
The Apostles' Creed is the shorter and older-in-form of the two great creeds. It was not written by the apostles at a single sitting, despite the legend that each contributed a line. It grew out of the questions put to candidates at baptism in Rome - do you believe in God the Father almighty? Do you believe in Christ Jesus? - and reached its present wording by about the eighth century.
Its shape is Trinitarian, because baptism is: one section for the Father, a long one for the Son, one for the Spirit and what the Spirit does.
I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth.
And in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died and was buried; he descended to the dead. On the third day he rose again; he ascended into heaven, is seated at the right hand of the Father, and will come again to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting. Amen.
Two features are worth noticing straight away. It is almost entirely narrative
- conceived, born, suffered, crucified, died, buried, descended, rose, ascended,
seated, will come. Christianity is a report of things that happened, not a list of principles. And it says I believe, singular, because it began as one person's answer at the font.
The word catholic here means universal or whole, from the Greek kath' holou. It is not a denominational label, and all four traditions say it.
Where it came from
The legend that the twelve apostles each contributed a clause appears by the fourth century and is not history. What is history is more interesting.
From the earliest period, baptism involved questions. The candidate stood in the water and was asked whether he believed in the Father, then in the Son, then in the Spirit, and was immersed after each answer. Hippolytus records this form in Rome around 215, and the questions there are already close to what we say.
By the fourth century the interrogation had been turned into a statement to be learned, recited and handed back - the traditio and redditio symboli, the handing over and giving back of the creed, which is still part of the catechumenate in several traditions. The Latin text stabilised by around 700.
So the Creed is a baptismal document before it is a theological one. That is why it is short, why it is narrative, why it is in the first person singular, and why it leaves out a great deal that a systematic summary would include. It is not trying to teach you everything. It is what you say when you are about to go under the water.
The Father
I believe
The Latin is credo, and the English believe has weakened underneath it. Credo is closer to I give my heart to - it is the word for entrusting yourself, not for estimating a probability. When the Creed says I believe in God, it is not reporting that God's existence seems likely. It is an act of allegiance.
Note also the singular. The Nicene Creed says we believe in its conciliar form, because a council speaks for the Church. The Apostles' Creed says I, because one person is being baptised, and nobody can do that for you.
in God, the Father almighty
Father first, before almighty. The order is deliberate: the power is His fatherhood's power, not the other way round. The God of Scripture is not a raw force who happens to be called Father; He is a Father whose love is not helpless.
Almighty translates omnipotens, itself translating the Greek pantokrator - ruler of all. Not chiefly a claim about how many heavy objects He could lift, but that nothing is outside His governance. Which is precisely why the problem of evil is a problem for Christians: a God who was not almighty would be easier to defend and not worth worshipping.
creator of heaven and earth
Everything that is not God is made by God. Heaven and earth is a Hebrew way of saying the whole of it - visible and invisible, matter and spirit, the angelic and the mineral. The clause rules out any second principle: no eternal matter, no rival power, no evil god. There is the Creator, and there is what He made.
Pause and thinkPause: the Creed says God is the Father before it says He is the Creator. Does the order matter?
It does, and it is the difference between Christianity and mere theism.
God is Father eternally - He did not become a Father when He made the world. Fatherhood in God is first of all His relation to the eternal Son. Creation is something He does; fatherhood is something He is.
The practical consequence is large. If God were first of all Creator, then the world would be needed to make Him what He is, and love would be something He took up rather than what He eternally is. Because He is Father first, creation is free and gratuitous - overflow, not requirement.
The Son
And in Jesus Christ
Jesus is a name - Yeshua, the Lord saves - given by an angel with a stated reason: for he shall save his people from their sins. Christ is not a surname but a title, the Greek for Messiah, the Anointed. Kings and priests were anointed; He is both.
his only Son, our Lord
Only Son - unigenitus, only-begotten. The Creed distinguishes His sonship from ours. We become sons by adoption and grace; He is Son by nature and eternally.
Our Lord - Kyrios, the word the Greek Old Testament uses to render the divine name. In the Roman empire, Kyrios Kaisar, Caesar is Lord, was the loyalty formula. To say Jesus is Lord was to decline it, and people died for the difference.
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary
The incarnation, stated in two clauses. Conceived by the Holy Spirit - this is God's initiative, a new beginning not produced by the old humanity. Born of the Virgin Mary - and truly born, of a particular woman, with a womb and a birth and everything that means. The Creed insists on both: He came from God, and He came out of Israel.
suffered under Pontius Pilate
The Creed skips the entire public ministry. There is nothing between the birth and the suffering - no parables, no miracles, no Sermon on the Mount. This is not disparagement of the ministry; it is the baptismal creed keeping to what must be confessed.
Pontius Pilate anchors it in history. A Roman prefect of Judaea, in office 26-36, attested in Tacitus and Josephus and named on a stone found at Caesarea in
- The Creed puts a civil servant's name next to the name of God, and the
effect is to say: this is not myth.
Suffered - passus. The verb covers the whole passion, and it matters that God's Son is its subject. The impassible God, in His human nature, suffers.
was crucified, died and was buried
Three verbs where one might do, and each is doing work.
Crucified - the specific death. Rome's punishment for slaves and rebels, designed for maximum shame. Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.
Died - against any suggestion that He merely fainted, or that the divine nature withdrew leaving a shell. He really died.
Buried - a body in a tomb, with witnesses who knew which one. The burial makes the empty tomb a checkable claim.
he descended to the dead
The hardest clause, and the one most often altered in modern translations - he descended into hell is the older English, where hell renders inferna, the underworld or realm of the dead, not the place of damnation.
The traditions understand it variously (see below), but the common core is this: Christ's death was not a pause. He went where the dead are, and He went as conqueror. 1 Peter 3:19 speaks of Him preaching to the spirits in prison; Ephesians 4:9 of His descending to the lower parts of the earth.
On the third day he rose again
Not was raised only but rose - the active voice. Both are scriptural; the Creed's active form guards His divinity. And on the third day, counted inclusively in the Jewish manner: Friday afternoon, Saturday, Sunday morning.
he ascended into heaven, is seated at the right hand of the Father
Ascended - a real human nature enters the life of God. Seated - the work is finished; a priest who has completed the offering sits down, and Hebrews makes much of the fact that the temple had no chairs. The right hand - the place of authority, not a location.
and will come again to judge the living and the dead
History has an end and it is a Person. The living and the dead - nobody is outside the jurisdiction; death is not an escape from accountability.
That the judge is the crucified one is the whole comfort of the clause. The one who will judge us is the one who was judged for us, and He still has the wounds.
The Holy Spirit and His work
I believe in the Holy Spirit
Brief here, because the Apostles' Creed predates the fourth-century controversies that forced the Nicene Creed to expand. But note that the Spirit is confessed with I believe in - the same formula as the Father and the Son, which is a claim of divinity even without further words.
the holy catholic Church
Holy - not because her members are impressive but because she is set apart and indwelt.
Catholic - from the Greek kath' holou, according to the whole: universal, entire, lacking nothing. Ignatius of Antioch uses it around 107. It is not a denominational term, and all four traditions say it without hesitation. Some Lutheran and Anglican usage says Christian instead in English, translating rather than transliterating.
Church - and note that she is an article of faith. You believe in God and you believe the Church exists and is holy - an object of faith because what she is cannot be read off from what she looks like on a bad Sunday.
the communion of saints
In Latin, communio sanctorum, which can mean either fellowship of the holy people or participation in holy things - the sacraments. Both senses were current and both are true.
The communion crosses death. The Church on earth and the Church in heaven are one body, and the members pray for one another. What follows from that - whether the living may ask the departed to pray - is the disputed question, treated in its own section.
the forgiveness of sins
Placed after the Church and the communion of saints, not before - because in the Creed's logic forgiveness comes through what God does in the Church: baptism first, and then the ministry of absolution.
the resurrection of the body
Not the immortality of the soul. The Latin is carnis resurrectionem - the resurrection of the flesh, which is more blunt than most English translations. This was the clause that made educated Greeks laugh at Paul in Athens, and it is the one the Church has never been willing to trade for respectability.
and life everlasting
Not endless duration but a quality of life - the life of God shared with creatures. The Creed ends where the story ends, with the whole redeemed creation alive in Him.
Where the four traditions stand
Catholic
The Apostles' Creed is used at baptism, at Mass in some circumstances, and as the opening of the Rosary. The Catechism of the Catholic Church is structured around it - Part One follows its clauses in order, which makes the Catechism itself the fullest commentary available. On the descent, the Catechism teaches that Christ descended in His soul, united to His divine Person, to the abode of the dead, to open heaven's gates for the just who had gone before Him - not to deliver the damned or to suffer further. The article on the Church is expanded in Catholic teaching to include the four marks - one, holy, catholic, apostolic - and the communion of saints is understood to include the Church militant on earth, the Church suffering in purgatory and the Church triumphant in heaven.
Orthodox
The Orthodox Church does not use the Apostles' Creed liturgically. It is a Western document, unknown in the East until the Middle Ages, and the Nicene- Constantinopolitan Creed alone is recited at the Divine Liturgy and at baptism. Orthodox Christians will recognise the Apostles' Creed and find nothing objectionable in its content, but it holds no formal status. The one clause where Eastern teaching is richer is the descent: the harrowing of Hades is not a subordinate article but the central image of Pascha itself, depicted in the resurrection icon and sung throughout the paschal season. Where Western piety tends to treat the descent as a brief interlude between Friday and Sunday, the East treats it as the moment of victory - Christ shattering the gates of death and raising Adam and Eve by the hand.
Lutheran
Luther's Small Catechism is built on three texts: the Ten Commandments, the Apostles' Creed and the Lord's Prayer, in that order - law, faith, prayer. Each article of the Creed receives an explanation that is deliberately personal: I believe that God has made me and all creatures... that Jesus Christ is my Lord, who has redeemed me, a lost and condemned person... that I cannot by my own reason or strength believe in Jesus Christ my Lord, or come to Him. Lutherans say Christian rather than catholic in most English versions, translating the word rather than leaving it open to misunderstanding. On the descent, the Formula of Concord treats it as Christ's triumphal descent to proclaim victory over death and the devil, not as continued suffering, and locates it after the vivification rather than before.
Anglican
Article 8 receives the three creeds - Nicene, Athanasian and Apostles' - as to be thoroughly received and believed, for they may be proved by most certain warrants of Holy Scripture. The Apostles' Creed is said daily at Morning and Evening Prayer in the Book of Common Prayer, which means that for a praying Anglican it is the most frequently repeated text after the Lord's Prayer. It is also the baptismal creed, put as questions to the candidate or the godparents in the older rites - preserving the interrogative form the Creed originally had. 1662 retains he descended into hell; some modern Anglican liturgies print he descended to the dead. Article 3 affirms the descent without specifying its content, and Anglican divines have differed over it, with the evangelical wing tending towards a proclamation of victory and the Anglo-Catholic wing towards the liberation of the righteous dead.
Work with it
Check yourself
What does the word "catholic" mean in the phrase "the holy catholic Church"?
-
Correct. Ignatius of Antioch uses it around 107, long before there was a distinct Roman communion. All four traditions confess it, and some Lutheran and Anglican versions translate it as "Christian".
-
The Creed predates that usage by centuries, and Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican Christians all say the word without meaning this.
-
It concerns extent and wholeness rather than age.
-
The Creed treats the Church as a visible body one can believe in and belong to.
Check yourself
Why does the Apostles' Creed say "I believe" while the conciliar form of the Nicene Creed says "we believe"?
-
Yes. It grew out of the baptismal questions, and nobody can be baptised on your behalf. The Nicene Creed was issued by a council speaking for the whole Church.
-
It is the public confession of the Church, learned and handed back by every candidate.
-
The grammatical difference reflects the setting of each text, not degrees of confidence.
-
The legend of individual apostolic authorship is not history; the Creed grew from the baptismal rite at Rome.
Check yourself
What does the Creed mean by "he descended to the dead"?
-
Correct. The older English "descended into hell" renders inferna, the underworld, not the place of damnation. The traditions differ over the details; all deny that He suffered further there.
-
No tradition covered here teaches this. The Formula of Concord explicitly treats the descent as triumph, not further suffering.
-
The Creed and the Scriptures deny this; His flesh did not see corruption.
-
The divine Person never ceased; His soul and body were separated, as happens in death, and both remained united to Him.
Objection drill
Creeds are exactly the problem. They are human words imposed on Scripture, used for centuries to decide who gets burned. Our church has no creed but Christ and no book but the Bible, and that is the apostolic pattern.
A model answer
The second sentence is a serious historical charge and should be met honestly before the argument is made: creeds have been used as instruments of coercion, and people were killed over them. That is a real stain, and no defence of creeds should pretend otherwise. But notice that the abuse was of the state's power, not of the summary itself, and that the traditions which abandoned creeds have not, on the evidence, proved less prone to expelling people over doctrine.
Now the argument. No creed but Christ is a creed. It is a short doctrinal statement, in fixed memorable form, which members are expected to affirm and which functions to distinguish insiders from outsiders. Every congregation has a set of things it believes and will not tolerate being denied from the pulpit. The only question is whether that set is written down where it can be examined, or held informally by whoever is currently in charge. The written version is harder to change quietly.
On the apostolic pattern, the New Testament contains creeds already. Paul introduces 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 with the technical vocabulary of receiving and handing on a fixed formula: Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, was buried, rose the third day, appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve. That is a creed, in circulation within a very few years of the crucifixion. Philippians 2:6-11 is almost certainly a hymn Paul is quoting. 1 Timothy 3:16 is another. One Lord, one faith, one baptism is a summary. Paul tells Timothy to hold fast the form of sound words he has heard - a fixed pattern, not a free improvisation.
On the relation to Scripture, this is the crucial point and it is usually missed. A creed does not add to the Bible. It states what the Bible means on the points where someone has started teaching otherwise using the Bible's own words. Arius did not reject Scripture; he quoted it constantly and had verses for everything. The Father is greater than I. The firstborn of all creation. The Council of Nicaea was not overruling Scripture; it was saying what Scripture, taken whole, requires - and it needed a non-biblical word, homoousios, precisely because every biblical word on offer could be signed by Arians with a private meaning.
That is the practical function. A creed closes the gap between quoting the Bible and teaching the faith. Without one, a congregation's only defence against an able teacher with a concordance is the personal judgement of the people in the room - which is exactly the position the fourth-century churches were in, and it went badly for decades.
One last point, offered gently. A church that says it has no creed still has to decide whether to baptise a man who denies the Trinity, and whether to let him preach. When that moment comes, whatever standard it reaches for is its creed. The question was never whether to have one.
Memory work
Turn each card over, then say honestly whether you knew it. Cards you miss come back sooner.